Fact Checkers Exposed The Truth Behind Globalist Agendas

lead stories didn't give a damn. So I fact check them. They fact check me back. I fact check them back. And it's just, you know, but that's the problem is, is, is that's, that's exactly what Boone and general Flynn are talking about in this fifth gen warfare, where you have, you know, the fact checkers are such an important part. And I, I do hope we can get Boone back here because that's something that I definitely want to kind of talk about is, is, you know, the fact checking aspect of this, they, they have fact checkers that are funded by these globalist entities. I mean, we all know this, you know, most of us understand this, but this is what really is being used as ammunition against us by the normies. And the normies don't even want to make sure that, you know, they're using the right caliber ammunition. So they put it in their gun and it doesn't go bang. And they're just, I got the ammo. So I'm, I'm, I'm right. You know, and people only have to open up the aperture just a little bit to see that this is happening. Look at, The White House has a bunch of content creators that they bring over. They post pictures. It's like a class photo. Then go look at those same personalities and go look at their social media. And what are you going to find? The same tweets, the same Instagram posts, the same message. That is a collaboration that they're doing on behalf of the White House. And now the White House isn't going to pay them. But then research them and what you're going to find out, you know, you go to open source, you go to some of these, you'll find out, you know, what's his name? Brooklyn dad, getting paid by NGOs and getting paid a lot of money. Jojo from jurors. So people can realize, and these people have, you know, a million, 2 million followers, half a million followers. So, you know, it's a significant impact when you look at the plus one method, you know, everybody shares it with one person. So it's there. The one thing, and I wish there was more of this conversation when it comes to election fraud, because, you know, You know, and even with what we saw in the Cary Lake trial, but the one thing no one talks about, and it's at the very beginning of this, governors and judges do not have the constitutional authority to change election laws. And that's at the very beginning of this problem. The only ones that can do that are state legislators. So before we even get to harvesting and before we even get to all these things, when you had governors and judges doing changing the way the election run, that election's already done. You already compromised it. And that's constitution. That's not opinion or any. And you'll see there's a couple of mainstream things that start to say, well, it's an interpretation of the constitution. No, it's not. It's written in there very clear. State legislators are the only ones that can change election laws. And we violated that. Yeah. You brought up great points about the NGOs and everything that's funding these people. Even content creators now and and it's crazy how it's always on the left right i mean i don't know very i'm sure there's some but there aren't the grassroots populist type podcasters like you and I that are being funded by anybody. I don't have any funding. I have a couple sponsors. I have one sponsor that, you know, pays me a flat fee and then the rest of them, it's based on commissions. It's based on what you guys, what you guys, you know, buy from these products. But, you know, we don't have the resources. And the reason for that is because we are speaking on behalf of the people. And so who's the ones that are going to fund this is the people. So, you know, that's a big thing to look into. All right. We, we got Boone back. I'm, Not to mention, one of the reasons we don't get the financial support behind our podcast is because they know that platforms are typically going to de-platform us. So they're going to lose that investment to us anyways when we get de-platformed. So Boone, welcome back. We were just talking about... Oh, can you hear us? Yeah, yeah. Hang on one second. Yeah, no problem. No problem. I'm going to mute you real quick. Yeah, the de-platforming thing, though, I don't know that that's necessarily... as big of a problem though, because like when I was on, when we were on YouTube and we were still allowed to be on YouTube, we'd be able to sustain ourselves with the platform that, you know, the platform, the advertising revenue that was generated through YouTube. So, I mean, that wasn't as big of a deal, but like you said, you get deplatformed and it's a huge problem. All right, we got you back, Boone. Yeah, yeah, I think I'm here for a minute. I got, I'm old and lazy. I get old phones and don't replace them and then they do weird things, but I'm in my house right now. You might hear my dog bark or something, but yeah, I'm just standing next to my charger so I can ride this thing to the end. Yeah, no worries. We're going to land this bird here pretty soon. But Boone, we were just talking about, you know, kind of going back to the fifth gen thing. And one of the adversaries that we have in this whole debacle is, you know, these fact checkers. Huge, huge asset. Go ask Lennon about fact checkers. One of his best techniques. Yeah. And, and you have these fact checkers that are funded by globalist organizations. They have dark money all over them. They have leftist money all over them. And, uh, you know, one of the concepts that we were talking about is the, they, they know that the average American, and this is no offense to my audience because I think you guys are above average in every way, but they know that the average American has the attention span of a goldfish. I famously use an example from Reuters where Reuters had a fact check that said, uh, I would ask Reuters did the Rothschilds patent the COVID-19 test prior to COVID 2019, back in 2015. And Reuters would famously, if you search that, Reuters fact check would pop up and it would say, no, the Rothschilds did not patent the COVID-19 test in 2015. And that's all you would see. So people, if you have even worse than the below average Americans would look at just that thumbnail and be like, look, it's fake, it says right there. Now, the ones that would click it would click it and they would read about two paragraphs and they would say, no, the Rothschilds did not patent the COVID test in 2015, blah, blah, blah. And then they'd go into a long diatribe. They'd get to the bottom and they'd be like, they didn't patent the test for COVID-19. It was called something else back then. Well, no shit, Sherlock. It wasn't called COVID-19 until 2019. But you did, in fact, patent a test that would work for detecting COVID-19. And it was modified in 2015, 2017, and finally in 2020 to detect COVID-19. So when you see something like that, that is what we're up against in this fifth generation warfare because your average American is going to look at that and say, ha ha, you're wrong. Reuters is trustworthy. Yes, you are correct. Everybody's got to slow down, look for the loaded language, look for the selective information, because that is how you build messaging and narrative. Yeah. And we saw it again with Pfizer when they were talking about, what was it, Directed Evolution? And they said, you know, they put out the press statement after that Project Veritas drop and said, it's not directed evolution, blah, blah, blah. But then like in the third paragraph, they're like, oh, yeah, by the way, we do mutate the virus in order to determine whether or not Paxlovid is going to be effective against mutations. Oh, so you're mutating the virus and there's no chance that that ever leaked out of a lab, you know, like it did over in Wuhan, China. Right.