Stop Ai Manipulation Take Back Control Now

You can, or at least you can shut things. It's only going to respond to the things that you put into it. Right. So they're regardless of, of that piece of the pie. Can you take yourself out of the situation? So you're the one not being screwed with, you know, you're the one not being manipulated, that's absolutely possible. And you know, this is session one, session two, you're going to get a lot of that information because that's, that's, that's what builds on what we're teaching from session one. I think session two is going to come out about mid year where people are going to start understanding, oh, okay. Well, how do I no longer allow myself to be a party that is used by my adversary? How do I take myself off the battlefield and, and worry about my own family? And I don't have to worry about being an instrument for somebody else because that is absolutely possible. You can mitigate it. You can reduce it. You can, in many, in some instances, you can completely neutralize it. That's even, that's a little bit harder, but we're going to have that discussion and people are going to be able to take themselves, you know, away. Then they're not going to be assets to, to this, to these operations. Colonel, do you want to add anything to that? No, I think so. I was just thinking that the United States government is pretty incompetent in psychological operations, except against its own people, which is a matter of the focus of its resources. There are, you know, the people within the intelligence community and military communities, especially special operations, have really understood psychological operations well for a long time, but I don't think the general public is ready or well equipped to understand it's, it's not, it's a different way of thinking about your objectives and the paths to it. And I'm just not sure how well, you know, there are the people who are going to be able to respond to learn the lessons and to sort of turn machines back on themselves or to mitigate that is I think a very small portion of the population. So Stephen Hawking famously said, I believe it was something along the lines of, whereas to in the short term, it's all about who controls the artificial intelligence in the long term, it's about whether or not the artificial intelligence can be controlled at all. And we're going to have, I honestly believe we're going to have this problem. We saw, I know on such a micro scale, but we saw, and I talked about this last week, we saw a YouTuber that got in trouble because, you know, while he was doing a live stream, he exited out of his live stream and showed his background. And his background image was like a porn site that was using artificial intelligence to place another streamer's face on a body and, and, you know, show sexual acts and doing so. And it's, that's terrifying. I mean, the concept of something like that happening, but this is something that's even more scary in the sense that this eventually is going to get to the point where it can be used against the populace in a way to go against us. In other words, if CanCon's too over the target, all of a sudden a video comes out of CanCon robbing a convenience store because you took my face and put my face on, you know, some, some crime. I mean, it doesn't have to be that it could be worse than that, whatever it may be. But when part of the battle that we're up against is this global entity that has unlimited resources and they're the ones that are controlling this artificial intelligence at the moment. And I mean, it's, I'm not going to lie. It's a little disheartening because it's, it's really difficult for us as citizens to overcome the capabilities of artificial intelligence that is, you know, light years ahead of us. And as far as the ability to do computations and stuff like that. So where, how do we kind of draw this line in the sand as to who's on what side and what capabilities do we have to combat that real quick? And before you answer that Boone, let me add one more question to the scenario that can put out there. I would think out of all of our senses sensors that our vision is the strongest, but is it when it comes to propaganda, given what CanCon just explained? Uh, propaganda. Okay. Propaganda in the sense of a campaign. Okay. Not just somebody lying to you about a thing. Okay. Because sign up as a campaign. This is what people don't realize. It's not about trickery. It's about a campaign that, that manipulates the perspective of conditions. And that's, that's important to understand. I will say, I'm going to, I'm going to take your question and say it's a great question, but I'm also going to say it's the perspective. And this is a good thing that, uh, that Sean was saying it's, it's about, you know, are we prepared for this and how many people are prepared for this? It's a small part of the population. We're searching in the dark right now for, Hey, how do we stop this thing? Okay. And, and you gave a great example of something that really is like a 2000 meter target though. Okay. And okay. What is it that's happening at 30 meters right now that we can affect change? And that's, that's what we have to start doing. We have to start looking and say, okay, we're, we're totally not even taking shots at our 30 meter targets, you know, cause everybody's so worried about what's at 800 meters and 2000 meters. And we're not going to get there if we don't neutralize those 30 meter targets. So we've got to get up, we've got to get up on our sites and we've got to start plugging these 30 meter targets and we've got to start making our way to that 800 meter target 30 meters at a time. And so the, the answer is, you know, yes, this is a big ominous thing. And none of us know all the details and how are we going to fight that thing? Well, that's, that's going to be, that's, that's really out there and we're going to make a lot of mistakes on the way there and, and by the way, they're going to continue to advance their program. But if we started hitting those 30 meter targets now, what does that mean? That means starting to build networks in your own neighborhoods. That means starting to identify, okay, who is running for office on my city council, are they backed by some of the people that I don't want to be, I don't want running things and how do we get them out of office so they don't have any controlling power? Okay. Everybody can do that right now. There's your 30 meter target. And once we get those people in those positions, now they start hitting their 30 meter targets. And that's how we start to kind of break the whole thing down. It's kind of like elephant one bite at a time. So I, and I also want to pull back and speak to the folks out there. And I mean, no disrespect when I say this, but I got to be straight for people who are, who are talking in the context of, Oh, this is a group of people that have existed for thousands of years and they manipulate things and, and okay, stop, stop, that's not your 30 meter target. What can you do right now? You know, I appreciate the fact that you have a good concept of what you believe history is and who controlled history. That's wonderful. But what's that going to do for you? What's that going to do for any of us other than take a whole lot of time for mental masturbation? It's really not going to do much. Hit your 30 meter targets. People hit your 30 meter targets and put people in position that are going to hit their 30 meter targets and eventually we'll get 800 meters out. We'll neutralize that one. This is a, this is about, this is a mindset that we all need to start adopting because we can get, we can go crazy town and get way out there in the weeds on stuff and I don't think that's a problem. I think we have to have the discussions, but I think those discussions need to be about 20% of the time, 80%, which is not 80% of the time people need to start talking about their 30 meter targets. What does that look like and how can you build a networks to start neutralizing them so at least you have a perimeter right now. We don't have a perimeter. We've got 30 meter targets sneaking up on us all the time because we're so worried about something we can't even see. To that, to that note, you know, going back to the fourth gen and fifth gen, the, the, the progression from fourth to fifth, you know, fourth gen, you have state actors versus non-state actors. The concept of the insurgency, the Taliban has below that kind of thing. And then you move into fifth generation warfare where, you know, it's not necessarily state actors at all. Although the state actors could absolutely be a player in this, but it doesn't have to be, this can be, you know, something like the world economic forum, the globalist, it could be something as simple as the mainstream media, a pharmaceutical company like Pfizer, you know, Moderna, you know, manipulating information when it's at that level, the state is out of this now and it's no secret that warfare has been the cash cow for, you know, for state governments. It's been the cash cow for, for eons. And now you look at this, this transition into fifth generation warfare. And all of a sudden we have this Ukraine, Russia conflict to pull us back into a conventional war, like we haven't seen since world war two, where it's one side and one side, two armies going at each other, uniforms and all that stuff. And you can tell who's, who's the bad guy and all that crap. Is it, it almost, and, and, you know, I might be off here, but it almost feels like this is something to keep this third gen, fourth gen warfare relevant as it transitions in, because they need to profiteer off of this. I mean, look, you got a hundred billion dollars now being sent to Ukraine to fund that war Russia's doing the same thing. I mean, their, their military industrial complex is, is, is roaring and going full steam ahead. So do you, do you think that there is some sort of a desire in that war to kind of try and pull society back to this concept of third and fourth gen warfare and keep us away from a transition or can they both exist at the same time? I think different organizations have different objectives, but that can absolutely exist on some level with, with some organization, with some entity. But I think that, I think if I look at Ukraine, I think that, yeah, I think it's being used, okay, to funnel money to different places. We've seen that in the United States. This is a, this is a technique, this is doctrine.