Video Analysis Bug Or Real Nyt 3d Reveal Truth

No, they move different for sure. Yeah, they definitely move different, but they still have that bug look to them. That's kind of what I wrote those off to. And like I said, I did the same through Final Cut Pro to try to get it as slow, but with it all being compressed video, it's still not the best. But I'll send it to you so you can take a look. No, no, no, it's fine. And frankly, I agree with you. It looks like a bug. Uh, and this is why I send it out to Twitter. This is why I want it 3d rendered. Um, because if we can 3d render it, then we can say, yes, it was a bug because it doesn't, it lines up or it doesn't line up with the other two or the other two are just completely off. I just, whoever does the 3d render will, will have the answer. I mean, the answer is in that thread and they're doing it. So I got this from the, the New York times. ran the scene through through cat third cat and AI version to come up with with these three, like these like draft, you know, like cat top drawing. So I'll share these can if you want to bring the search this first one on the screen. And this would come from I believe you had it labeled as camera, possibly the camera for area. So this would have been Charlie Kirch, right? This would have been Frank Turks. Yes. He was running FaceTime at the time. And for the audience, that's Frank Church, the one that had the white hat, the white shirt that people were saying was, was hand signals from, from this vantage point and, and they're drawing. And you can see that top building where, you know, the alleged shooters, where you got that other video coming from. Assuming that that guy took that shot does that, cause this is down in a bowl is kind of how we explain it. You know, it's an amphitheater that goes down. Is it possible, assuming that he was there, that guy took the shot, would you say from your experience that that is a possible shot? Easy shot. Well, I say easy shot. Here's another inconsistency that no one's brought up. What did he shoot off of? He has no bipods. I absolutely brought that up. He shot off his backpack. CanCon says his backpack, I think it's the towel. I think that he had that towel and maybe he put the towel there and he didn't shoot. He didn't shoot off the towel. His back at me. I will. So Zeb, I 100% agree with you on that. And we'll get into that as we progress through this. But so, so here, my, my theory is this and, and the problem with, with the theory that, that me and Alpha, I think kind of agree on is, you know, Alpha believes that, that this kid probably did take the shot or it came from there at the very least, not necessarily him, but it came from that area. I don't think it came from that area. Well, I have, I have four or five independent people doing, whether the TikToks or YouTube videos saying that it sounded close and they were all off to the right of Charlie. So, so that was something that you and I talked about. And for, for somebody that's a layman and, you know, hasn't been in combat, hasn't been shot at, you know, that kind of thing. I kind of wonder, are they confusing the crack pop? Cause like, that's a really distinguishable sound, you know, the, the, the crack versus the pop of the rifle and the crack being the round hitting, which by the way, we don't know where the hell the round hit. You know, when it hits flesh, it won't necessarily make that, that sound. Yeah. I mean, we don't know.