Tulsi Exposes Hackable Systems Doj Confirms Election Lies
preparedness"She didn't say machines — she said these systems. She's been briefed." Boone noting Tulsi's careful language about hackable election systems — the word choice tells you she knows exactly what she's talking about and where the vulnerability is. Systems, not machines. That distinction matters.
Share & Download
Transcript
When she said, Mr. President, we have evidence of how the, she didn't say machines, she said these systems. So she's been briefed, I'm sure. These systems are hackable and how they can be manipulated and the results can be changed. Wow, I was amazed. And she talked about the hand count process and so forth. I thought, wow, there you go. She just laid it out there in a cabinet meeting. What I said in the last two weeks, it had become confirmed to him by the highest authorities. That's what I mean. Those, those level of people are now seeing the evidence they need to see. They've had a chance to review everything. The U S government now officially knows these machines are, are horse manure. Yes, sir. They're horse. And that's interesting when I was talking to some folks that, uh, you, you know, um, attorneys that, you know, One in particular who's helping Tina. We were shooting a bull a little bit and he had made a comment. He said, wow, the election integrity process or the election efforts, I presume he meant from the White House and others, it's moving at a much quicker pace than I even thought it was going to. And hopefully that can be used to the benefit of Tina Peters. Was that the attorney who's a former Navy SEAL friend of ours or somebody else? No, no, no. Somebody else that I would say you have financially been helping to pay the bills to cover for, covers Tina's defense. It doesn't narrow it down. I did tell you. Oh, one of Tina's attorneys? Correct. Oh, okay. Not a female, a male. Okay. Gotcha. Yeah. Yeah. Well, it probably doesn't look from Tina's point of view like things are moving fast. It's from a lawyer's point of view, things may be moving fast. I don't know. I think if it were me, we had a call, you know, we'd long ago call JSOC. So I'm not the, so I guess I have a different conception of what moving fast is, but a lawyer might think of things as moving fast. Tina's going to be out. Tina's going to be out. Tina's going to be out this quarter. I think that the information is, I think we're very close to full exposure of everybody, of all the systems and the people. Patrick, I get that feeling as well. And interestingly, Juan, again, we'll bring him in here a little bit. He's backstage. He had an event out here several weeks ago. It was two back-to-back weekends. And one of the folks who's now at DOJ, He had mentioned, he said, Hey, just FYI, after the Todd Blanch comments at DOJ about Tina, when he mentioned Tina Peters and the lawfare and so forth, and then Trump spoke at DOJ, this person said, FYI, we in the civil rights division regarding Colorado and Tina have been told to stand down. It's now in the criminal division of DOJ looking at Colorado. Well, that's good news. Well, I did a video the other day about how they should all lawyer up. The judge should lawyer up. The prosecutor should lawyer up. I was deeply involved in that for several years under the twists and turns. There are so many in a trial and the indictment and trial of somebody. There are dozens of limited decisions that have to be made, and the trial can be made a kangaroo trial. by a judge making these little decisions along the way that completely make it lopsided. So when he's in court at the trial, he can say, look, it's just, I tried it. This is what the jurors found. But in fact, they have made so many decisions that made it impossible for the defendant to win before he ever walks into the courtroom.
Continue the Journey
This video is part of a guided experience. Watch the full story in order.
Start the Preparedness Journey →